Know where your treasure is

In the wake of our economic system closely resembling a yo-yo in the hands of a toddler (sure it’ll go up and down, but it’s not going back as high as it used to be), there’s some fantastic thoughts from Eugene Cho over at beauty and depravity. The story below is great – but I’d recommend checking out the whole post.

That… reminded me of a meeting my wife and I had a meeting with a friend in Korea this past summer. She’s a “foreigner” living in Korea as a missionary and simply, a follower of Christ. She’s learned the Korean language and asides from being “white,” she’s pretty much “Korean.” She’s adopted the customs and cultures and grown a love for the people of Korea and beyond.

She and her husband have also adopted a lifestyle of simplicity. This is different from a life of poverty. They’ve simply chosen to live as simply as possible…free from the stuff we often find ourselves loving, lusting, and labeling.

During our conversation, she shared her enthusiasm for our vision to fight global poverty and her commitment to keep us in prayer. That in itself was enough: deeply edifying and encouraging. She proceeded to share that she didn’t really have any money to donate at this time. We explained that was not what we were asking for…her emotional and spiritual support meant a great deal.

What happened next…we will never forget.

She opened her shoulder bag and proceeded to take out 6 or 7 small boxes and explained:

“My husband and I have committed to a life of simplicity and we don’t have money to give. I love and believe in what you guys are doing. These boxes are my jewelry…my heirlooms. I don’t need this. I want to give this to your organization. Please sell it and use it to help the poorest of the poor.”

God convicted me with this question:

“Where is your treasure…Who is your treasure?”

[1] faith and money: where is your treasure? « beauty and depravity

Blog Action Day – October 15

Those of you who have been reading TheGeoffRe(y)port for a while might be aware that I participated in Blog Action Day last year, and got on board with a worldwide group of bloggers to blog about the environment. Well, Blog Action Day is back, and this time it’s all about poverty. SO – if you write a blog, get yourself over to the Blog Action Day site, register, and post something (anything) about poverty on October 15th. I will be doing so here.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Ranges Worship Photos

Anna’s Worship Photos « Ranges Community Church

I realise I’m turning into a bit of a link farm, but I wanted to share this one. The above photo comes from a great collection of worship photos over at the Ranges Community Church blog. Can’t put my finger on why they hit a spot for me, but they did.

Matt Stone on talking with one another

Matt Stone left a fantastic and profound comment over at Al Hirsch’s blog, so I thought I’d better pass it on.

I think there is a basic failure to understand that the equal and opposite of one evil can often be an equal and opposite evil. Balance is not considered and found too hard, it is often not even considered in the first place. Many seem to operate under what I call “the myth of the slippery slope”, a way of seeing the world that leads them to suspect that anything half between two extremes is half way to hell, a myth which reinforces that anything less than extremism is compromise. But what if we operated under a different story, the story of the life giving well in the middle of the desert, one which draws people in from extremist positions?

Consider what the world would be like if liberal Christians could sit down at the table with conservative Christians and say, look I am really, really concerned for the rights of gays but I agree with you that a position which tosses the New Testament out the window cannot reasonably be called Christian and I part company from the religious syncretists that do. Looky, I think you need to be more compassionate and we’ll disagree on many things but I agree there are outer limits to what can be considered Christian dialogue. Consider also if conservatives could say, look I think you’re too flaky but i agree that hate mongers distort the truth as much as syncretists, yeah lets set some outer limits to what can be called Christian dialogue. This is exactly what the Athenasian creed did in terms of Christology, I think we need something similar in terms of sex theology, an agreement on outer limits in both directions.

fundamentalism: a true expression of Christianity or not? : The Forgotten Ways

Not really worth adding anything to it, but I couldn’t really agree more.

Palin says America is the greatest good in the world

Sarah Palin, whilst spouting some ridiculous and racially charged barbs at Barack Obama, also let out this pearler:

Palin told supporters the Democrat was therefore “not a man who sees America as you and I do, as the greatest force for good in the world”.

John McCain takes low road on Obama a month from election | Herald Sun

America as the greatest force for good in the world. This from the VP candidate designed to woo conservative evangelicals, and a candidate who herself professes to be a Christian.

Our greatest hope, regardless of our political persuasion, cannot be in governments, nations or people.

Biden Says Bailout = Less Aid Money

IFILL: What promises — given the events of the week, the bailout plan, all of this, what promises have you and your campaigns made to the American people that you’re not going to be able to keep?

BIDEN: Well, the one thing we might have to slow down is a commitment we made to double foreign assistance. We’ll probably have to slow that down.

The Vice-Presidential Debate – International Herald Tribune

Been flicking through the American VP debate transcript, and it looks like despite expectations that she’d flunk completely, Palin looks to have made some sense. Big disappointment when I read the above quote from Joe Biden though: America’s Wall St bailout will cost the promise to double foreign assistance. Bono couldn’t have been more on the money on calling these guys out on this.

Of course, the only reason you can pull out of a promise is because you made it in the first place, which naturally McCain/Palin didn’t.

Dan Wilt on why we can’t give up on the institution

Dorothy has seen the wizard, and she has 4 possible choices:

1. Run away, completely. (the faithleaver)

2. Run away, but stay in the orbit of the idea. (the runningprophet)

3. Stand still, and do nothing. (the silentbystander)

4. Run to the wizard, see yourself as part of the “we,” and help fix a gift that could be beautiful once again (the hopegiver)

I’ve come to believe that God is not afraid of historical process nor human process; we however, are deeply suspect of both.

Over the course of thousands of years, the containers have been many, and have often shaped the content of our beliefs as the Church. Guilt by association can follow, and a desire to distance ourselves rises to the surface in the face of the inadequacies marring the landscape of an otherwise helpful scene.

Frank, you’ve chosen the path of 2., and I wish you all the best. Tell us who we are, who the world sees us to be. But for the love of all things holy, allow the Church to be human, and to move through time and culture as sojourners.

I however, choose the path of 4. I see the whole shebang as the “we,” and I’ll work within as long as I have breath.

Response To Frank Viola On “Why I Left The Institutional Church” on The OOZE  ::  DanWilt.com

I started reading Frank Viola’s “Pagan Christianity” – and got most of the way through it before I decided that I couldn’t keep reading. Everything he said was well researched, thought out and for the most part accurate. But it felt like I was just beating up my best friend, with his hands tied and a blindfold over his eyes. Reformation needs to stem from love.

When the (virtual) world was young

In honor of our 10th birthday, we’ve brought back our oldest available index. Take a look back at Google in January 2001.
Google

This is freaking cool. Search the Google Index as per January 2001. The results link off to the internet archive, so you can even see what the sites looked like. It’s pretty awesome. Nostalgia never felt so nerdy.

(Hat tip to Gizmodo)

An Abortion Question

Here’s a bunch of statements that I believe to be true – followed by a question. 

  • Nobody believes that killing babies is morally acceptable (unless under some freakishly extreme hypothetical – not the point)
  • Thus people who believe that abortion is morally acceptable, have a different belief about when a conceived egg becomes a person/baby
  • It seems to me that the question of when a fertilised egg becomes a human is not primarily a religious question
So, why then is it that the question of whether or not abortion is morally acceptable viewed as being a question of religious belief? 
Victoria (my state of Australia) has recently been re-jigging their abortion laws and stretching the lateness in a pregnancy that a woman can have an abortion. And I was amazed at the reactions from people on blog comments, that without any mention of religion or God – people defending women’s rights to an abortion were instinctively accusing the pro-life brigade of being a bunch of right wing religious bigots. Why have we as christians polarised this debate into being a question of religious belief?
Side note: I’m not going through a process of questioning my position on abortion – which is a fairly conservative one. I’m just perplexed as to how the conversation has been twisted around.

Don’t always do what Jesus would do

One of the most helpful approaches to thinking about the Trinity, and Jesus in particular has been this concept that we serve a God who is inherently incarnational. It centres around this idea that in God choosing to become like us, through Jesus, we can understand something about who God is, and as a result how we ought to live out God’s mission in the world. It’s the heart behind lots of great ideas: from the emerging-missional type stuff right through to the “What Would Jesus Do?” wristbands. (Just to clarify, that’s to demonstrate the gap – rather than equate the two)

And in terms of how that effects the way we act, in lots of conversations it really has been boiled down to: “What would Jesus do?” Which as a first pass gets it pretty much spot on – but as you start to work things through, it can fall to pieces. Because while Jesus is our example, sometimes we can’t do what Jesus would do. And sometimes even if we can, we shouldn’t.

I mentioned the book “What Jesus Meant” in my train story (which I reckon is one of my best posts in ages), and the book has really challenged me to balance my thinking out a bit. Because there are things that Jesus said, that he doesn’t want me to say. The question has to be “What would Jesus have me do”, rather than what Jesus would do himself. I am not the way, the truth nor the life. People should not put their faith or hope in me, but in the one I follow.

The example that Jesus does set down for us is that of humility. “I only do what I see the Father doing”, reminds us that if the Son of God would not do things out of reliance on his own strength, even on his own holiness or his own divinity, then we must do the same.

(Hat tip to robbymac for the pictures)