<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Abortion Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/2008/10/01/an-abortion-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/2008/10/01/an-abortion-question/</link>
	<description>politics ~ theology ~ life ~ fart jokes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:47:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermayn</title>
		<link>http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/2008/10/01/an-abortion-question/comment-page-1/#comment-13713</link>
		<dc:creator>Jermayn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 01:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/?p=636#comment-13713</guid>
		<description>I believe there is a scripture talking about when &#039;life&#039; starts..

From memory it is after 15 days or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe there is a scripture talking about when &#8216;life&#8217; starts..</p>
<p>From memory it is after 15 days or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/2008/10/01/an-abortion-question/comment-page-1/#comment-13707</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/?p=636#comment-13707</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Rick - it got auto-moderated so it only just got through now. Sorry about that. Good call on the second statement not being true for everyone: I must admit that&#039;s where I find it all a bit weird. But I&#039;d still hold that for &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;most&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; people, at least people who have come to a viewpoint through a deliberate thought process - the concept of killing an actual person is abhorrent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Rick &#8211; it got auto-moderated so it only just got through now. Sorry about that. Good call on the second statement not being true for everyone: I must admit that&#8217;s where I find it all a bit weird. But I&#8217;d still hold that for <b><i>most</i></b> people, at least people who have come to a viewpoint through a deliberate thought process &#8211; the concept of killing an actual person is abhorrent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/2008/10/01/an-abortion-question/comment-page-1/#comment-13705</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 05:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/?p=636#comment-13705</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Susannah - got me thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Susannah &#8211; got me thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susannah</title>
		<link>http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/2008/10/01/an-abortion-question/comment-page-1/#comment-13704</link>
		<dc:creator>Susannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 05:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/?p=636#comment-13704</guid>
		<description>Interesting question Geoff. At uni we looked at thw whole debate in regards to what Rabbis thought and this passage was central Exodus 21:22-24 &quot;If men who are fighting hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely [e] but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman&#039;s husband demands and the court allows. 23 But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, 24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25 burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise. 
As I understand it Jews and Christian ( not sure about Muslims) take this passage to mean that abortion is indeed death of a person, because the death of an unborn person is punished the same way as the death of a fully born and living outside the womb one. Thus those who regard this text as sacred take an anti abortion state.  So my answer to your question would be that it is a religious question because it is a religious text which is forming viewpoints on the matter ( if you use this text). 
Interestingly though, some Rabbis, based on this text are pro-choice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting question Geoff. At uni we looked at thw whole debate in regards to what Rabbis thought and this passage was central Exodus 21:22-24 &#8220;If men who are fighting hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely [e] but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman&#8217;s husband demands and the court allows. 23 But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, 24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25 burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.<br />
As I understand it Jews and Christian ( not sure about Muslims) take this passage to mean that abortion is indeed death of a person, because the death of an unborn person is punished the same way as the death of a fully born and living outside the womb one. Thus those who regard this text as sacred take an anti abortion state.  So my answer to your question would be that it is a religious question because it is a religious text which is forming viewpoints on the matter ( if you use this text).<br />
Interestingly though, some Rabbis, based on this text are pro-choice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/2008/10/01/an-abortion-question/comment-page-1/#comment-13702</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/?p=636#comment-13702</guid>
		<description>I think your second point may not be true. Joe Biden (US nominee for vice-president) explicitly believes life begins at conception but still supports abortion. He simply has a higher value for a woman&#039;s right to choose.

This is similar to pro-life folks who support abortion for instances of rape, incest, etc..

I&#039;m not sure if that answers your question but I think the presumptions are not the same for all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your second point may not be true. Joe Biden (US nominee for vice-president) explicitly believes life begins at conception but still supports abortion. He simply has a higher value for a woman&#8217;s right to choose.</p>
<p>This is similar to pro-life folks who support abortion for instances of rape, incest, etc..</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if that answers your question but I think the presumptions are not the same for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

