<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New to TheGeoffRe(y)port &#8211; A Comments Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/2007/02/16/new-to-thegeoffreyport-a-comments-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/2007/02/16/new-to-thegeoffreyport-a-comments-policy/</link>
	<description>politics ~ theology ~ life ~ fart jokes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:47:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/2007/02/16/new-to-thegeoffreyport-a-comments-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-3075</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/2007/02/16/new-to-thegeoffreyport-a-comments-policy/#comment-3075</guid>
		<description>Geoff, I&#039;ve read your comments policy. I wanted to comment on it, but there was no opportunity. Surely there&#039;s a UrbanDictionary definition in there someplace for unresolved comment tension? 

Already there&#039;s - 

Commentia - hitting the  link only to forget your witty repartee
Commentuplicity - making the same comment as someone earlier: RT*C! (read the ****ing comments!)

Anyway.

The only problem I have with the comments policy is the team affiliation. I know Malaysian-foreign-imports-duty style if one raises the barriers in order to protect, one generally also raises the feebleometer in accordance: that said, I&#039;m now copping stick from Essendon and Carlton supporters ref: time between drinks. Not good enough. Perhaps most sad of all I&#039;m running out of comebacks. Carlton is OK because I&#039;ve still got 20 goals to nill at halftime from last year, but Essendon is tough. Waving one&#039;s jacket around above the head really doesn&#039;t cut it anymore.

Is there a site someplace that arms Richmond supporters with appropriate comebacks? 

Unless we simply shrug and admit the hopeless addiction?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff, I&#8217;ve read your comments policy. I wanted to comment on it, but there was no opportunity. Surely there&#8217;s a UrbanDictionary definition in there someplace for unresolved comment tension? </p>
<p>Already there&#8217;s &#8211; </p>
<p>Commentia &#8211; hitting the  link only to forget your witty repartee<br />
Commentuplicity &#8211; making the same comment as someone earlier: RT*C! (read the ****ing comments!)</p>
<p>Anyway.</p>
<p>The only problem I have with the comments policy is the team affiliation. I know Malaysian-foreign-imports-duty style if one raises the barriers in order to protect, one generally also raises the feebleometer in accordance: that said, I&#8217;m now copping stick from Essendon and Carlton supporters ref: time between drinks. Not good enough. Perhaps most sad of all I&#8217;m running out of comebacks. Carlton is OK because I&#8217;ve still got 20 goals to nill at halftime from last year, but Essendon is tough. Waving one&#8217;s jacket around above the head really doesn&#8217;t cut it anymore.</p>
<p>Is there a site someplace that arms Richmond supporters with appropriate comebacks? </p>
<p>Unless we simply shrug and admit the hopeless addiction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/2007/02/16/new-to-thegeoffreyport-a-comments-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-3036</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/2007/02/16/new-to-thegeoffreyport-a-comments-policy/#comment-3036</guid>
		<description>PS - how about a new poll? I was the only right answer on the podcast one. It&#039;s time for something new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS &#8211; how about a new poll? I was the only right answer on the podcast one. It&#8217;s time for something new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/2007/02/16/new-to-thegeoffreyport-a-comments-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-3035</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geoffreport.com/wp/2007/02/16/new-to-thegeoffreyport-a-comments-policy/#comment-3035</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m almost scared to comment. Anytime someone blogs about comments its obligatory for someone else to make a meaningless comment. This is mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m almost scared to comment. Anytime someone blogs about comments its obligatory for someone else to make a meaningless comment. This is mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

